Post Reply
Site Admin
Posts: 1681
Joined: Thu Sep 26, 2002 3:57 pm


Post by salsinawi » Tue Aug 15, 2006 11:59 pm

The GSHAP Global Seismic Hazard Map

D. Giardini (ETH Zurich, Switzerland), G. Grünthal (GFZ Potsdam, Germany), K. Shedlock (USGS, Golden, CO, USA) and P. Zhang (CSB, Beijing, China)

Keywords: earthquakes, global seismicity, seismic hazard assessment, seismic risk


The Global Seismic Hazard Assessment Program (GSHAP), a demonstration project of the UN/International Decade of Natural Disaster Reduction, was conducted in the 1992-1998 period with the goal of improving global standards in seismic hazard assessment. The GSHAP Global Seismic Hazard Map has been compiled by joining the regional maps produced for different GSHAP regions and test areas; it depicts the global seismic hazard as peak ground acceleration (pga) with a 10% chance of exceedance in 50 years, corresponding to a return period of 475 years.


The Global Seismic Hazard Assessment Program (GSHAP) was launched in 1992 by the International Lithosphere Program (ILP) with the support of the International Council of Scientific Unions (ICSU), and endorsed as a demonstration program within the framework of the United Nations International Decade for Natural Disaster Reduction (UN/IDNDR).

Minimization of the loss of life, property damage, and social and economic disruption due to earthquakes depends on reliable estimates of seismic hazard. National, state, and local governments, decision makers, engineers, planners, emergency response organizations, builders, universities, and the general public require seismic hazard estimates for land use planning, improved building design and construction (including adoption of building construction codes), emergency response preparedness plans, economic forecasts, housing and employment decisions, and many more types of risk mitigation. The GSHAP was designed to provide a useful global seismic hazard framework and serve as a resource for any national or regional agency for further detailed studies applicable to their needs.

This report accompanies the publication of the GSHAP Global Seismic Hazard Map, compiled by joining the regional maps produced for different GSHAP regions and test areas. A summary of the hazard assessment procedures followed during GSHAP and the list of the main contributors is given.

The assessment of seismic hazard

Seismic hazard is defined as the probable level of ground shaking associated with the recurrence of earthquakes. The assessment of seismic hazard is the first step in the evaluation of seismic risk, obtained by combining the seismic hazard with vulnerability factors (type, value and age of buildings and infrastructures, population density, land use, date and time of the day). Frequent, large earthquakes in remote areas result in high seismic hazard but pose no risk; on the contrary, moderate earthquakes in densely populated areas entail small hazard but high risk.

The basic elements of modern probabilistic seismic hazard assessment can be grouped into four main categories:

Earthquake Catalogues and DataBases: the compilation of a uniform database and catalogue of seismicity for the historical (pre-1900), early-instrumental (1900-1964) and instrumental periods (1964-today).
Earthquake Source Characterization: the creation of a master seismic source model to describe the spatial-temporal distribution of earthquakes, using evidence from earthquake catalogues, seismotectonics, paleoseismology, geomorphology, mapping of active faults, geodetic estimates of crustal deformation, remote sensing and geodynamic models.
Strong Seismic Ground Motion: the evaluation of ground shaking as function of earthquake size and distance, taking into account propagation effects in different tectonic and structural environments and using direct measures of the damage caused by the earthquake (the seismic intensity) and instrumental values of ground motions.
Computation of Seismic Hazard: the computation of the probability of occurrence of ground shaking in a given time period, to produce maps of seismic hazard and related uncertainties at appropriate scales.
Seismic hazard maps depict the levels of chosen ground motions that likely will, or will not, be exceeded in specified exposure times. Hazard assessment programs commonly specify a 10% chance of exceedance (90% chance of non-exceedance) of some ground motion parameter for an exposure time of 50 years, corresponding to a return period of 475 years. Peak Ground Acceleration, a short-period ground motion parameter that is proportional to force, is the most commonly mapped ground motion parameter because current building codes that include seismic provisions specify the horizontal force a building should be able to withstand during an earthquake. Short-period ground motions affect short-period structures, e.g. one-to-two story buildings, the largest class of structures in the world.

Compilation of the global hazard map

In order to mitigate the risk associated with the recurrence of earthquakes, the GSHAP fostered a regionally coordinated, homogeneous approach to seismic hazard evaluation (Giardini and Basham, 1993; Basham and Giardini, 1993; Giardini, 1999). The GSHAP strategy was to establish a mosaic of regions lead by selected regional centers and of multinational test areas under the coordination of large working groups. Some areas, specifically the Mediterranean and the Middle East, were included in several overlapping projects. In addition, the GSHAP allied with existing hazard projects to avoid duplications and strengthen cooperation across borders (i.e. in the Balkans and Near East). Working groups of national experts representing the different disciplines required for seismic hazard assessment were assembled for each region or test area. These working groups produced common regional earthquake catalogues and source characterizations, and compiled or computed regional hazard values. In some cases (parts of Africa, the Western Pacific, and North America) the GSHAP hazard map was derived from published materials.

The compilation of the GSHAP global seismic hazard map, planned to be one of the main products of the program, was based on the integration of all results from GSHAP Regions and Test Areas in three greater GSHAP areas: (1) the Americas (Shedlock and Tanner, 1999), (2) Asia, Australia and Oceania (Zhang et al., 1999; McCue, 1999), and (3) Europe, Africa and the Middle East (Grünthal et al., 1999). The compilation was conducted at USGS, Golden CO. The global map follows closely the maps produced by the GSHAP regions and test areas, and in particular the regional compilations. Some adjustments were required in order to render the map more homogeneous and significant differences with the regional maps can be seen in the Philippines, the Himalayan provinces of India and Iran.

The global compilation entailed only the integration of existing hazard maps. No attempt was made to compile global data-sets such as earthquake catalogues and seismic source models.

Finally, an editorial committee supervised the integration of the results of all the regional projects into the global seismic hazard map.

The GSHAP Global Seismic Hazard Map

The GSHAP Global Seismic Hazard Map depicts peak ground acceleration (pga) with a 10% chance of exceedance in 50 years, corresponding to a return period of 475 years. The site classification is rock everywhere except Canada and the United States, which assume rock/firm soil reference ground conditions. This GSHAP map depicts the likely level of short-period ground motion from earthquakes in a fifty-year window. The map colors chosen to delineate the hazard roughly correspond to the actual level of the hazard. The cooler colors represent lower hazard while the warmer colors represent higher hazard. Specifically, white and green correspond to low hazard (0 - 8% g, where g equals the acceleration of gravity); yellow and orange correspond to moderate hazard (8 - 24% g); pink and red correspond to high hazard (24 - 40% g); and dark red and brown correspond to very high hazard ( ? 40% g). In general, the largest seismic hazard values in the world occur in areas that have been, or are likely to be, the sites of the largest plate boundary earthquakes.

The pga values were combined with a shaded relief base map using ARC/Info 7.2.1 geographic information system (GIS) software. The cell size of the pga and relief base grids is 0.0833 degrees.

For more information

The GSHAP map and all associated documentation, including regional reports, maps of seismicity, source characterization information, and GSHAP yearly reports are available via the Internet through the GSHAP homepage,

Copies of the global map (folded or unfolded) may be obtained from:

MS 966 Box 25046
Denver, CO 80225 USA Swiss Seismological Service
ETH Hoenggerberg
8093 Zurich - Switzerland

Copies of the Annali di Geofisica volume containing all of the published GSHAP reports may be obtained from:

Istituto Nazionale di Geofisica
via di Vigna Murata 605
00143 Roma - Italy Swiss Seismological Service
ETH Hoenggerberg
8093 Zurich - Switzerland


National agencies, international scientific associations, seismological observatories and research institutions and individual scientists supported or participated in the GSHAP. In total, over 500 scientists contributed to this global undertaking. The insignia of primary contributors appear on the map. The list of primary contributors is given in Appendix.

Some proprietary software for hazard computation (FRISK88M) was supplied freely to GSHAP by R. McGuire.


P. Basham & D. Giardini, Technical guidelines for global seismic hazard assessment, Annali Geofis., 36, n.3-4, 15-26, 1993
D. Giardini, The Global Seismic Hazard Assessment Program: 1992-1999, Annali Geofis., this volume, 1999

D. Giardini & P. Basham, The Global Seismic Hazard Assessment Program, Annali Geofis., 36, n.3-4, 3-14, 1993

G. Grünthal, S. Sellami, D. Mayer-Rosa & D. Giardini, Compilation of the GSHAP regional seismic hazard for Europe, Africa and the Middle East, Annali Geofis., this volume, 1999

K. McCue, Seismic hazard mapping in Australia, the Southwest Pacific and Southern Asia, Annali Geofis., this volume, 1999

K. Shedlock & J. G. Tanner, Seismic hazard map of the Western hemisphere, Annali Geofis., this volume, 1999

P. Zhang, Zhi-xian Yang, H. K. Gupta, S. C. Bhatia & K. M. Shedlock, Global Seismic Hazard Assessment Program (GSHAP) in continental Asia, Annali Geofis., this volume, 1999

Appendix: Principal contributors to the GSHAP global seismic hazard map


D. Giardini (ETH Zurich, Switzerland), G. Grünthal (GFZ-Potsdam, Germany), K. Shedlock (USGS, Golden, CO, USA) and P. Zhang (CSB, Beijing, China)

Editorial Board:

P. Basham (Canada), D. Giardini (Switzerland), G. Grünthal (Germany), H. Gupta (India), D. Mayer-Rosa (Switzerland), K. McCue (Australia), R. McGuire (USA), K. Shedlock (USA), P. Zhang (China)

Principal contributors for Central-North America:

J. Adams (Canada), S. Alvarez (El Salvador), T. Barnhard (USA), P. Basham (Canada), E. Camacho (Panamá), N. Cardoze (Panamá), N. Dickman (USA), M. Feuillard (Guadeloupe), A. Frankel (USA), V. García-Acosta (México), L. Gomez (Dominican Republic), S. Halchuk (Canada), S. Hanson (USA), M. Hopper (USA), F. Klein (USA), E. Leyendecker (USA), L. Lynch (Trinidad), L. Mansinha (Canada), G. Martinéz (México), C. McQueen (UK), W. Montero (Costa Rica), G. Morán (El Salvador), V. Moreno (Puerto Rico), C. Mueller (USA), M. Ordaz (México), M. Ortega (Panamá), U. Osuji (Trinidad), G. Peraldo (Costa Rica), D. Perkins (USA), G. Rogers (Canada), W. Rojas (Costa Rica), K. Shedlock (USA), J. Shepherd (Trinidad), G. Súarez (México), J. Tanner (Canada), J. Toral (Panamá), M. Villagrán (Guatemala), J. Viode (Martinique), D. Weichert (Canada), R. Wesson (USA), C. Zelaya-Goodman (México), R. Zúñiga (México)

Principal contributors for South America:

J. Alva (Perú), M. Araujo (Argentina), M. Arellano (Ecuador), M. Assumpçao (Brasil), M. Bufaliza (Argentina), R. Cabré (Bolivia), J. C. Castano (Argentina), C. Dimaté (Colombia), L. Drake (Bolivia), J. Escalon (Colombia), A. Fuenzalida (Colombia), A. Giesecke (Perú), R. Goberna (Colombia), J. Grases (Venezula), E. Kausel (Chile), J. Mendoza (Venezuela), L. Ocola (Peru), J. Ramirez (Colombia), H. Rendón (Venezuela), K. Rowley (Trinidad), A. Sarria (Colombia), K. Shedlock (USA), J. Shepherd (Trinidad), E. Silgado (Perú), A. Singer (Venezuela), J. Tanner (Canada), J. Velásquez (Paraguay), A. Veloso (Brasil), H. Yepes (Ecuador), C. Zelaya-Goodman (México)

Principal contributors for Europe-Mediterranean:

A-Q. Amrat (Jordan), C. Bosse (Germany), T. Camelbeeck (Belgium), I. Cecic (Slovenja), M. Chadi (Tunisia), T. de Crook (Holland), A. Drumya (Moldova), D. El Foul (Algeria), M. El Khoubbi (Syria), M. Erdik (Turkey), M. García-Fernández (Spain), J.-C. Gariel (France), D. Giardini (Switzerland), S. Gregersen (Denmark), G. Grünthal (Germany), B. Guterch (Poland), P. Halldorsson (Iceland), W. Hays (USA), M. Herak (Croatia), E. Ibrahim (Egypt), P. Labak (Slovakia), J. Lapajne (Slovenia), C. Lindholm (Norway), W. Lenhardt (Austria), M.-J. Jiménez (Spain), P. Maentyniemi (Finland), K. Makropoulos (Greece), J.-M. Martínez-Solares (Spain), D. Mayer-Rosa (Switzerland), B. Muco (Albania), R. Musson (UK), C. Papaioannou (Greece), G. Papakyriacou (Cyprus), L. Peruzza (Italy), S. Riad (Egypt), P. Scandone (Italy), V. Schenk (Czech Republic), Z. Schenkova (Czech Republic), S. Sellami (Switzerland), A. Shapira (Israel), D. Slejko (Italy), C. Sousa-Oliveira (Portugal), M. Stucchi (Italy), E. Sulstarova (Albania), B.-A. Tadili (Morocco), V. Ulomov (Russia), R. Verbeiren (Belgium), R. Wahlstroem (Sweden), B. Zabukovec (Slovenia), T. Ziros (Hungary)

Principal contributors for Asia:

K. Abdullabekov (Uzbekistan), T. Annaka (Japan), T. Ashirov (Turkmenistan), Ayzberg (Byelorussia), S. Balassanian (Armenia), S. Bhatia (India), S.-N. Chang (Taiwan), T. Chelidze (Georgia), J. Choudhury (Bangladesh), M. Erdik (Turkey), M. Gao (China), D. Garcia (Philippines), A. Gassanov (Azerbaijan), M. Ghafory-Ashtiany (Iran), D. Giardini (Switzerland), H. Gupta (India), N. Kondorskaya (Russia), T. Kronrod (Russia), A. Kurskeev (Kazakhstan), M. McGuire (USA), G. Molchan (Russia), S. Negmatullaev (Tadzhikistan), M. Pandey (Nepal), L. Peng Siong (Malaysia), B. Pustovitenko (Ukraine), E. Rogozhin (Russia), K. Shedlock (USA), M. Swe (Myanmar), B. Tavakoli (Iran), A. V. Timush (Kazakhstan), V. Trifonov (Russia), A. Turdukulov (Kyrgyzstan), V. Ulomov (Russia), N. D. Xuyen (Vietnam), Z. Yang (China), P. Zhang (China)

Principal contributors for Africa:

K. Atakan (Norway), L. Chapola (Malawy), D. Hlatywayo (Zimbabwe), F. Kebede, (Ethiopia), D. Lombe (Zambia), V. Midzi (Zimbabwe), I. Nyambok (Kenya), S. Sellami (Switzerland), F. Tugume (Uganda), G. Turyomurugyendo (Uganda)

Principal contributors for SW Pacific - SE Asia:

W. Boyce (Samoa), K. McCue (Australia), G. McVerry (New Zealand), R. Punong-Bayan (Philippines), H. Shah (Indonesia)

Cartography and GIS:

A. Tarr (USGS, Golden, CO, USA) , N. Trevor (USGS, Golden, CO, USA), U. Lemgo (GFZ-Potsdam, Germany)

Hazard Computation Software:

R. McGuire (Risk Engineering Inc., Boulder, CO, USA)


Compilation of the GSHAP regional seismic hazard
for Europe, Africa and the Middle East

G. Grünthal, C. Bosse (GeoForschungsZentrum Potsdam, Germany),
S. Sellami, D. Mayer-Rosa & D. Giardini (ETH Zurich, Switzerland)


The seismic hazard map of the larger Europe-Africa-Middle East region has been generated as part of the global GSHAP hazard map. The hazard, expressing Peak Ground Acceleration expected at 10% probability of exceedance in 50 years, is obtained by combining the results of 16 independent regional and national projects; among these is the hazard assessment for Libya and for the wide sub-Saharan Western African region, specifically produced for this regional compilation and here discussed to some lenght. Features of enhanced seismic hazard are observed along the African Rift zone and in the Alpine-Himalayan belt, where there is a general eastward increase in hazard with peak levels in Greece, Turkey, Caucasus and Iran.


The compilation of the GSHAP global seismic hazard map, planned to be one of the main products of the program, is based on the integration of all results from GSHAP Regions and Test Areas in three greater GSHAP areas: (1) the Americas (North, Central and South), (2) Asia, Australia and Oceania, and (3) Europe, Africa and the Middle East. This report deals with the generation and compilation of the different seismic hazard data and the homogeneous mapping of hazard in the greater area (3) Europe, Africa and the Middle East, conducted by the GFZ Potsdam.

According to the original GSHAP planning (Giardini, 1999), the Europe-Africa-Middle East area was to be covered by the GSHAP Regions (3) Central-Northern Europe, (4) Mediterranean, (5) sub-Saharian Africa, (6) Middle East and the Arabian Peninsula, and (7) Northern Eurasia (western portion only). However, the development of GSHAP in the Mediterranean and Middle East became more complex, and had to rely on the activation on a number of ad-hoc regional test areas (Ibero-Maghreb, ADRIA, Eastern African Rift, CAUCAS; see below) and of independent but related projects (RELEMR, CirPan, Turkey; see below). In addition, for the super-regional compilation, specific national hazard maps were introduced in areas of pronounced border discrepancy (Slovenia, Greece) and a special effort was conducted at ETH Zurich to compile the hazard for those areas of Africa with no available maps.

In keeping with the approach of the GSHAP global map compilation, only the hazard maps were used, expressing Peak Ground Acceleration expected at 10% probability of exceedance in 50 years, and no attempt was done to integrate the different models of seismic source zones.

Compilation of Regional Seismic Hazards

In the end, altogether 16 independent regional maps were collected, modified and integrated at GFZ Potsdam in order to produce a homogeneous hazard for the global map. The geographical extent of these different contributions to the greater GSHAP area is shown in Figure 1. Reports on most of the individual projects are included in this volume, and only a few comments are given here, with the exception of the hazard results for Western Africa, Libya and the Middle East, which are presented here for the first time. Therefore, these two areas are dealt with in detail. A brief description of the editing and compiling process is given below.

The numbering used in the following list corresponds to the area identification in Figure 1. It should be noted that in most cases considerable overlaps existed among different areas. This redundancy allowed to produce independent assessment of methodologies across boundaries and to obtain a smoothed mapping in agreement with several regional projects.

1. Central Europe

This vast area, including the United Kingdom, Ireland and the German speaking countries, has been compiled as the main part of the GSHAP Region 3. It also includes Southern France (south of 44°N), which was not originally included in Region 3 nor in the Ibero-Maghreb program (cf. 9. below) and which has been processed at GFZ (Grünthal et al., 1999).

2. Iceland

Part of the GSHAP Region 3 (Grünthal et al., 1999).

3. Fennoscandia

Part of the GSHAP Region 3 (Grünthal et al., 1999).

4. Northern Eurasia

GSHAP Region 7 (Ulomov et al., 1999).

5. Poland-Czech Rep.-Slovakia

Part of the GSHAP Region 3 (Grünthal et al., 1999).

6. Balcans north of Greece and northerly adjacent regions (cf. 10.)

CirPan project (Musson, 1999).

7. Slovenia

The national seismic hazard map for Slovenia was provided by Zabukovec (1998, personal communication), to improve the fit between the regional hazard maps.

8. Italy

Processed as the main part of the ADRIA GSHAP test area (Slejko et al., 1999).

9. Ibero-Maghreb

GSHAP test area (Jimenez et al., 1999).

10. Greece

Greece participated in the ADRIA test area, which covered only part of the Greek territory. The national seismic hazard map for Greece was provided by K. Makropoulos (Athens University) to fill up the void left in the regional coverage. The original Greek map as it is used here covers the whole southern Balkans, including Albania, Macedonia and the southern part of Bulgaria.

11. Turkey

Part of the "Turkey and neighboring regions" project, covering also the whole Caucasus and the Aegean (Erdik et al., 1999).

12. Near East

Since 1993, the U.S. Geological Survey (USGS) and the United Nations Educational, Scientific and Cultural Organization (UNESCO) have been cooperating with Eastern Mediterranean Region (EMR) earth science organizations of Turkey, Lebanon, Cyprus, Syria, Jordan, Israel, Palestinian Authority, Egypt, Saudi Arabia and Yemen under the program "Reduction of Earthquake Losses in the Eastern Mediterranean Region (RELEMR)". The European -Mediterranean Seismological Center (EMSC) has coordinated the exchange of seismicity data among these countries. Among the RELEMR goals was the compilation of the regional seismic hazard, which was performed under the GSHAP umbrella.

The Eastern Mediterranean Region, because of its geological structure, seismicity, topography, and climate, has been subjected to many earthquake disasters during the past two thousand years, resulting in great losses of life and property. Earthquake ground shaking and tsunamis, the main causes of past disasters, are expected to continue to be the most dangerous threats to the built environment of each EMR country. Seismicity in the EMR is mainly associated with the northward movement of the Arabian plate. The 1,000 km-long western boundary of the Arabian plate is a complex plate boundary, extending from zones of sea-floor spreading in the Red Sea to zones of plate convergence in Turkey, and lies along the line of the Gulf of Aqaba, the Dead Sea rift, and the Ghab depression. The sense of motion along the transform fault system is left lateral, with the east side moving northward relative to the west side. Total displacement is estimated at about 107 km since Oligocene time, with an annual rate of about 0.5 cm over the last 7 to 10 million years. Seven damaging earthquakes have occurred in the EMR in the last decade. The Ms 7.2 earthquake occurred in 1995 in the central Gulf of Aqaba region caused damage in nearby communities in Jordan, Egypt, Israel, and Saudi Arabia and was felt for more than 700 km; the aftershock sequence lasted for more than 1 year with numerous shocks exceeding Ms 5.0. For the first time, countries in the region worked together to process seismic data using various software packages and a unified data set. The magnitude of the main shock and the robust aftershock sequence demonstrate the threat that earthquakes continue to pose to the EMR.

The probabilistic ground shaking map for the EMR was assembled at ETH Zurich by D. Mayer-Rosa and S. Sellami, on the basis of maps contributions from G. Papakyriacou (Cyprus), S. Riad, E. Ibrahim and M. Sobaih (Egypt), A. Shapira (Israel), A. Amrat (Jordan), M. Al Haddad (Saudi Arabia; Al Haddad et al., 1994), C. Tabet (Lebabon), and M. El Khoubbi (Syria; El Khoubbi, 1997); the RELEMR coordination was ensured by W. Hays of USGS. The resulting regional map is not a calculated map, but rather a smoothed composite map based on the existing ground shaking hazard maps of individual EMR countries. The main difficulty was that the available sources are very different in term of mapping parameters, probability levels and exposure times. The result integrates all the information into a unified map expressing Peak Ground Acceleration expected at 10% probability of exceedance in 50 years (Figure 2). With modifications in both the level and spatial distribution of the peak ground acceleration values, especially at country boundaries, the map was presented at the 1998 ESC General Assembly in Tel Aviv and approved by RELEMR. A new RELEMR Task Group "Hazard Maps and Applications" has now been established to prepare future EMR probabilistic ground shaking hazard maps on a scale of 1:250,000, on the basis of available data on the EMR source, attenuation path, and local site geology parameters.

13. East African Rift

GSHAP test area (Midzi et al., 1999).

14. Iran

Main part of the GSHAP Region 6 (Tavakoli and Ghafory-Ashtiany, 1999).

15. Caucasus

Main part of the CAUCAS GSHAP test area, covering also parts of Turkey and Iran (Balassanian et al., 1999).

16. West Africa and Libya

In the global distribution of GSHAP regions and test areas, the largest region not covered by any project was the whole sub-Saharian Western Africa and Libya. In order to complete the global GSHAP map, a simplified seismic hazard map for Western Africa and Libya was produced by S. Sellami, M. Furer and D. Mayer-Rosa at ETH Zurich.

Western Africa.

This stable continental area, mostly a very ancient plateau, displays few clearly recognised, active tectonic features. The seismicity is not well known, due to the lack of historical records and of modern seismic networks, and different regions of Africa are not equally covered (Ambraseys and Adams, 1986, 1992). As input to the regional seismic hazard assessment, two seismicity datasets were used: (1) the catalogue from the British Geological Survey (Musson, 1994), containing earthquakes from 1600-1993 with magnitude larger than 4.0 and considered complete for magnitudes over 5 since 1950 and over 6 since the beginning of the century, and (2) the NEIC catalogue for more recent years (1993-1998). The NEIC catalogue of the significant destructive earthquakes was also used, in order to have a sketch of the zones who have already experienced damages.

The delineation of homogeneous source zones is very difficult in this area, owing to the sparse and incomplete seismicity record and the large uncertainties on the earthquake parameters. Because of the scale and scope of the study and the limitations in the input data, only large source zones were designed, on the basis of the distribution of seismicity together with a scheme of the tectonic pattern (Clifford and Gass, 1970). Only four source zones on the continent plus a unique source for Madagascar were used, without introducing background seismicity. The catalogue investigation and the delineation of the source zones were done with Wizmap (Musson, 1998). No specific attenuation relationship nor relevant instrumental data are available for the studied area. In the work for the Eastern African Rift GSHAP test area (Midzi et al., 1999), an attempt was made to compare some regional relationships with those by Joyner and Boore (1982, 1988) for hard rock and a close agreement between the regional attenuation relation curves and those widely used globally was found. The Joyner and Boore (1982) relationship was also adopted for this study. We note that the strong motion attenuates strongly at distances greater than 100km.

A probabilistic approach was applied, using the code Seisrisk-III (Bender and Perkins, 1984) for calculations. In order to test the procedure, the same approach was applied also to neighboring source zones of eastern Africa already included in the Eastern African Rift test area (Southern Yemen, Eastern Kenya and South Africa; Midzi et al., 1999), with very consistent values of hazard. The PGA values determined for Madagascar and the region between Angola and Namibia are in the range 0.02-0.04g ; the West part of Africa has maximum values around 0.08g and equatorial West Africa slightly higher at about 0.1g.

Libya. The seismic hazard for Libya was assessed using the same approach. The area however is much smaller and the information regarding the seismicity is more complete. Ambraseys (Ambraseys, 1984, 1994; Ambraseys et al., 1994) published specific studies on the seismicity and the seismotectonics of Libya, which were used to prepare a catalogue. Other information on existing faults and the results from a previous hazard study (Mallick, 1977) was reported by Kebeasy (1981). Since no information on attenuation was available for the area, we applied the same law adopted in the Ibero-Maghredb GSHAP test area (Jimenez et al., 1999); since a robust regional law is lacking, Ibero-Maghreb has choosen to adopt the relationship proposed by Joyner and Boore (1981). The PGA values range between 0.08 and 0.16g in northern-central Libya.

Processing and Results

The compilation of a homogeneous map of seismic hazard for the whole Europe-Africa-Middle East region required several iterations of smoothing and border matching between the different regional products. While all contributors have followed the same basic seismotectonic probabilistic approach, differences in the delineation of the seismic source zones or in the adopted attenuation relationships resulted in sometimes different hazard levels in border areas.

The largest difficulties were met in the Mediterranean, owing to the large number of independent test areas (Figure 1). To illustrate the different philosophies in defining source zones, the different seismic source zones produced by different projects for the Mediterranean region are shown together in Figure 3. Even here, however, it was easy in most cases to understand and adjust differences in obtained peak horizontal accelerations from different sources. There were homogeneous transitions when joining the Ibero-Maghreb data with those for southern France, the Italian data with those from the GSHAP Region 3 to the north and northwest, and the Greek data with those from the central Balkans. In the Eastern Alps the national map for Slovenia was introduced to smooth the transition among the different projects working in the area. The resulting peak horizontal acceleration map for the Mediterranean region is depicted in Figure 4.

Finally, some adjustment was done in the phase of integration of the global map. In particular, the attenuation relationships used in the Middle East region (Iran, Caucasus and Region 7) had to be integrated.

The only area left out from the regional compilation (shown in white in Figure 1) corresponds to the aseismic part of Iraq; here the hazard was mapped by simulating the attenuated effect of the seismic activity in the Dead Sea fault area (Near East) and in the Zagros province of Iran.

The joint PGA hazard map for the whole Europe-Africa-Middle East, based on the integration of the 16 different regional and national contributions, is shown in Figure 5. Features of enhanced seismic hazard are observed along the African rift zone and in the Alpine-Himalayan belt, where there is a general eastward increase in hazard with peak levels in Greece, Turkey, Caucasus and Iran.


We acknowledge the contributions of many groups and individual scientists, responsible for hazard mapping at regional and national level. The integration and graphical rendering at GFZ Potsdam was performed by U. Lemgo. The cooperation of K. Shedlock, V. Ulomov and P. Zhang was instrumental for the integration of the Europe-Africa-Middle East region in the global seismic hazard map.


Al Haddad, M., Siddiqi, G. H., Al Zaid, R., Arafah, A., Necioglu, A., & Turkelli, N., 1994. A basis for evaluation of seismic hazard and design criteria for Saudi Arabia, Earthquake Spectra, 10, no2, 1994
Ambraseys, N. N., 1984. Material for the investigation of the seismicity of Tripolitania. Boll. Geof. Teor. Appl. 26: 143-153.

Ambraseys, N. N., 1994. Material for the investigation of the seismicity of Libya. Libyan studies 25:7-22.

Ambraseys, N. N. & Adams, R. D., 1986. Seismicity of the Sudan. Bull. Seismol. Soc. Am. 76, 483-493.

Ambraseys, N. N. & Adams, R. D., 1992. Reappraisal of Major African Earthquakes. Natural Hazards 4, 389-419.

Ambraseys, N. N., Melville, C. P. & Adams, R. D., 1994. The Seismicity of Egypt, Arabia and the Red Sea, a historical review. Cambridge Press.

Bender, B. & Perkins D., 1987. "SEISRISK III: A Computer Program for Seismic Hazard Estimation", USGS Technical Report n.1772.

Clifford, T.N. & Gass, I.G., 1970. African magmatism and tectonics. Oliver & Boyd. Edimbourgh.

Cornell, C.A., 1968. Engineering seismic risk analysis. Bull. Seismol. Soc. Am., 18, 1583-1606.

El Khoubbi, M., 1997. Seismic hazard for Syria, CERG Thesis, Geneva
Gruenthal, G. & the GSHAP Region 3 Working Group, 1999. Seismic Hazard Assessment for Central, North and Northwest Europe: GSHAP Region 3, Annali di Geofisica, GSHAP Special Volume.
Kebeasy, R. M., 1981. Seismicity and seismotectonics of Libya. Bulletin of IISEE. Vol. 19 pp. 17-32.

Jiménez, M.-J., García-Fernández, M. & the GSHAP Ibero-Maghreb Working Group. Seismic Hazard Assessment in the Ibero-Maghreb Region, Annali di Geofisica, GSHAP Special Volume.

Joyner, W.B. & Boore, D. M., 1981. Peak horizontal acceleration and velocity from strong-motion records including records from the 1979 Imperial Valley, California earthquake, Bull. Seism. Soc. Am., 71, 2011-20.
Joyner, W. B. & Boore, D. M., 1982. Prediction of earthquake response spectra. USGS Open-File Report 82-977, 16p.

Joyner, W. B. & Boore, D. M., 1988. Measurement, characterisation and prediction of strong ground motion. Proc. Earthq. Eng. Soil Dynamics II, GT Div/ASCE, Park City, UT.

Mallick, D.V., 1977. Seismic zoning of Libya. Sixth world conference on earthquake engineering, Tokyo, Japan, vol 4., pp 1-16.

Midzi, V., Hlatywayo, D. J., Chapola, L. S., Kebede, F., Atakan, K., Lombe, D. K., Turyomurugyendo, G., & Tugume, F. A., 1999. Seismic hazard assessment in Eastern and Southern Africa, Annali di Geofisica, GSHAP Special Volume.

Musson, R. M. W., 1994. The BGS Sub-Saharan African earthquake catalogue. British Geological Survey Technical Report WL/94/28.

Musson, R. M. W., 1998. WizmapII. British Geological Survey Internal Report.

Musson, R. M. W., 1999. Probabilistic seismic hazard maps for the North Balkan region. Annali di Geofisica, this volume.

Slejko, D., Camassi, R., Cecic, I., Herak, D., Herak, M., Kociu, S., Kouskouna, V., Lapajne, J., Makropoulos, K., Meletti, C., Muco, B., Papaioannou, C., Peruzza, L., Rebez, A., Scandone, P., Sulstarova, E., Voulgaris, N., Zivcic, M., and Zupancic, P., 1999. GSHAP seismic hazard assessment for the Adria region, Annali di Geofisica, GSHAP Special Volume.

Tavakoli, B., & Ghafory-Ashtiany, M., 1998. Seismic hazard assessment of Iran, Annali di Geofisica, GSHAP Special Volume.

Ulomov, V., and the Working Group of the GSHAP Region 7, 1999. Seismic hazard of northern Eurasia, Annali di Geofisica, GSHAP Special Volume.

Figure captions
Figure 1. Areal coverage of hazard maps compiled and integrated to produce the regional map for the Europe-Africa-Middle East region.

Figure 2. Map of seismic hazard for the Near East region, expressing Peak Ground Acceleration expected at 10% probability of exceedance in 50 years, produced jointly by GSHAP and the UNESCO/USGS RELEMR project (see text for details).

Figure 3. Compilation of all the seismic source zones produced for the test areas in the larger Mediterranean area.

Figure 4. Horizontal Peak Ground Acceleration seismic hazard map representing stiff site conditions for an exceedance or occurrence rate of 10% within 50 years for the Mediterranean region.

Figure 5. Joint horizontal peak ground acceleration seismic hazard map representing stiff site conditions for an exceedance or occurrence rate of 10% within 50 years for the whole greater GSHAP area covering Europe, the Mediterranean, Africa, and the Middle East based on the 16 different data sets described in the text and displayed in Fig. 1.

Post Reply